graphprotocol / graphprotocol/contracts
Consider using anvil instead of hardhat node
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Solidity
- Stars
- 374
- Forks
- 176
- Avg merge
- 1d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Speed gainz 🚀
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, commands, or acceptance criteria are named. Start by locating the repository's Hardhat node setup and determine what replacing it with Anvil would affect; done would require an agreed migration scope and confirmation that the relevant contract workflows still work.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- solidity
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100