graphprotocol / graphprotocol/contracts

[SECURITY] AegisVale-001: Unnecessary Inline Assembly (CWE-1109, Medium)

Open
#1,355 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Solidity
Stars
374
Forks
176
Avg merge
1d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Description

Security Disclosure — AegisVale-GRAPH-001

Reported to: The Graph Security Team
Date: 2026-08-18
Severity: Medium | CWE: CWE-1109
Status: Open


Executive Summary

During security research of graphprotocol/contracts, we identified instances of unnecessary inline assembly that reduce defense-in-depth protections and may introduce potential security risks.


Findings
Inline Assembly Without Return Value Checks

Assembly blocks using call() do not check return values, silently swallowing call failures.

Risk: Silent call failures may bypass critical guards; re-entrancy exposure.


Recommended Remediation
  1. Add require(success) checks after all low-level calls in assembly
  2. Document all assembly with NatSpec comments
  3. Replace assembly with Solidity equivalents where possible

References

Good-faith security disclosure by AegisVale (VIAIE Ecosystem).
Contact / engage services: USDT on Ethereum — 0xBaADe5b370F1A1c9FF31e89da70667c78D350B8A

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the Solidity assembly blocks that use call(), since the issue names no files, tests, or specific entry points. Review each call's return-value handling and the surrounding security assumptions; done means the relevant blocks have documented handling, checked failures, or justified Solidity replacements.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
solidity
Domain
blockchain, security
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.