googleprojectzero / googleprojectzero/Jackalope
The difference between WinAFL and Jackalope
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1.4k
- Forks
- 157
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I built a harness for WinAFL and I’m currently using it with WinAFL. Now I want to use the same harness with Jackalope. Can I reuse it without changing anything in the code?
What I mean is: does Jackalope have the same structure as WinAFL? Since I already built a harness for WinAFL and want to use it with Jackalope, can I do that directly, or will I need to modify it?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Compare the harness expectations and execution structure of WinAFL and Jackalope, then document whether the existing harness works unchanged or which modifications are required.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- security, tooling
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100