googlefonts / googlefonts/roboto-flex
Cyrillic wght: 100-900 | wdth: 100 | slnt: 0 | GRAD: -50 - +50 | opsz: 14
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 525
- Forks
- 35
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Here are my observations for grad -50 and 50
I already posted about grad 0 [here](https://github.com/TypeNetwork/Roboto-Flex/issues/184) Looking at whole range together: Grads -50 and 50 are consistent with grad 0, however some of the issues become more pronounced.
__________________________________________
wght: 100 | wdth: 100 | slnt: 0 | opsz: 14
Grad -50:
1. И diagonal is too light (see Ии together). This is still slightly present in Grad 0.
2. Л feels generous in width
Grad +50:
1. breve.cyr and breve.cyr.case - could have a little more weight on the 'vertical' parts, which would support both their presence and modulation more coherent with letterforms.
__________________________________________
wght: 400 | wdth: 100 | slnt: 0 | opsz: 14
Grad -50,0,50:
1. breve.cyr and breve.cyr.case seem dark in comparison to letterforms, I would also recommend more contrast for them.
2. ж,Ж are slightly dark in Grad -50, same was reported for Grad 0. This becomes most present in Grad 50, same for dark и.
Grad 50:
1. л - the leg (left stroke) feels a little dark in Grad 50.
__________________________________
wght: 900 | wdth: 100 | slnt: 0 | opsz: 14
Grad -50,0,50:
1. в is too thin on horizontals
2. У is too thin on its top part
3. breve.cyr and breve.cyr.case are too thin
Grad -50:
1. Д, but especially Л seem light/bright in text.
Grad 50:
Cyrillic issues described below are related to the features which come from Latin:
- dark diagonals (esp. in UC)
- weight relation between verticals and horizontals: they seem more differentiated in UC than in LC.
As a result Latin M is dark while H and O is much less. O and o observed together give slightly different feeling of modulation, O is lighter on horizontals. Cyrillic features described below are partly a consequence to this, but perhaps these could be made slightly more subtle?
1. Л appears light/bright, esp. in title case setting. Д has same feature but to smaller extent. LC л and д don't have that.
2. Ии appear dark in text.
3. Same as Ж which could be noticed in Grad 0, but is more present in Grad 50.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.