[enhancement] Decouple Regression Model validation from building a regression model
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1.9k
- Forks
- 283
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 135
Description
### What's hard to do? (limit 100 words)
Currently, we do k-fold validation every time we call the constructor [1] of RegressionEstimator. The k-fold validation is private within the class. However, there's a need for using the validator without using the model [2], which calls the EstimatorModel to do k-fold validation. This is confusing.
[1] https://github.com/google/xls/blob/6497966ee820e29c7b86552511aaddb2a54430af/xls/estimators/delay_model/delay_model.py#L355-L360
[2] https://github.com/google/xls/blob/6497966ee820e29c7b86552511aaddb2a54430af/xls/contrib/integrator/area_model/area_characterization_client_main.py#L405-L406
### Current best alternative workaround (limit 100 words)
N/A
### Your view of the "best case XLS enhancement" (limit 100 words)
Decouple RegressionEstimator validation from constructor, allowing validation without using the model.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.