[enhancement] Improve ScopedVerifyProcEquivalence to track token dependencies & support conditional send
Open
enhancement
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1.9k
- Forks
- 283
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 135
Description
### What's hard to do? (limit 100 words)
ScopedVerifyProcEquivalence won't verify that procs maintain token dependency semantics and has no support for multiple conditional sends (even if they are mutually exclusive) on a single channel. This limits somewhat the sorts of procs that can be validated.
### Current best alternative workaround (limit 100 words)
None
### Your view of the "best case XLS enhancement" (limit 100 words)
Support these use cases
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.