Google Fonts Knowledge *Point size*: correction needed and possible expansion

Quote https://fonts.google.com/knowledge/glossary/point_size

> The original point measured 72.289 parts per inch, but has been rounded to simply 72 since the 1990s, in line with the 72 dpi (dots per inch) of the displays of the first Macintosh computers.

This has two major issues:
1. The number “72.289” is misinformed. Correction is needed.
2. It doesn’t acknowledge other point systems (e.g., the Didot point of the Europeans), nor does it acknowledge typesetting software that follow tradition (e.g., TeX). Possible expansion is needed.

“The original point” in the quote is really just “the original (agreed) *American* point”, established by the Type Founders Association of the US in the 1890s. The US national standard *defines* one point to be *exactly* 0.013837 inches (NIST Handbook 44, Appendix C). This makes a point measures 1/0.013837≈72.2700007 parts per inch. I have no idea where that 72.289 figure comes from…

TeX follows this tradition by defining its point to be exactly 72.27 parts per inch. The rounding of a point to 72 parts per inch appeared in the late 1970s (not 1990s) with the introduction of PostScript from Adobe. TeX also supports this bigger point.

An even bigger point was developed in Europe, which was based on the French inch (cue the Napoleon height jokes). A Didot point measures approximately 67.5583 parts per (American) inch.

I think it’s worth providing *accurate* definitions. It’s also worth acknowledging *world-wide* differences.