google / google/digitalbuildings
Revisit if using both SFSS and SFVSC is necessary
Open
Ontology Model
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 461
- Forks
- 178
- Avg merge
- 9h 26m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
SFVSC (and other speed control types) require the run status and command field, therefore including SFSS is extraneous.
We should either:
- Remove run_command and run_status as required on the VSC types
- Revise precedent so that if a canonical type uses a VSC type it does not need the SS type (explore if this has ramifications for downstream analytics)
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.