google / google/autocxx

Abstract naming stuff

Open
#520 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
architectural good first issue
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
2.6k
Forks
175
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

We should deal with names for functions, types and typedefs in a similar way, so that things like #494 are fixed for all of them. We should see what we can make uniform for the different analysis phases, maybe extracting to a new phase.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by comparing how functions, types, and typedefs are named across the analysis phases, using issue #494 as the referenced case; done means a uniform naming approach is implemented for all three.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.