Apparent bug with for loops

I only know a little about how the fuzzing process works, and barely at all about how atheris instruments the bytecode, but I've noticed the following discrepancy:

```python
import atheris

with atheris.instrument_imports():
import sys

@atheris.instrument_func
def Fuzz(data: bytes):
string = 'thisisalongstringtotestatherisandtomakesurethatithandlesaforloopcorrectly'

if len(data) < 1:
return

fdp = atheris.FuzzedDataProvider(data)

data_unicode = fdp.ConsumeUnicode(len(data))

if len(data_unicode) <= 0 or data_unicode[0] != "t":
return
elif len(data_unicode) <= 1 or data_unicode[1] != "h":
return
......
elif len(data_unicode) <= 71 or data_unicode[71] != "l":
return
elif len(data_unicode) <= 72 or data_unicode[72] != "y":
return
raise ValueError("BOOM!")

if __name__ == '__main__':
atheris.Setup(sys.argv, Fuzz)
atheris.Fuzz()
```

works fine, but when I condense it into a for loop:

```python
import atheris

with atheris.instrument_imports():
import sys

@atheris.instrument_func
def Fuzz(data: bytes):
string = 'thisisalongstringtotestatherisandtomakesurethatithandlesaforloopcorrectly'

if len(data) < 1:
return

fdp = atheris.FuzzedDataProvider(data)

data_unicode = fdp.ConsumeUnicode(len(data))

for i in range(len(string)):
if len(data_unicode) <= i or data_unicode[i] != string[i]:
break
else:
raise ValueError("BOOM!")

if __name__ == '__main__':
atheris.Setup(sys.argv, Fuzz)
atheris.Fuzz()
```

Expected behaviour:
Both examples take a comparable amount of time (taking into consideration that the unrolled loop is probably faster) and finish with the completed string as a crash example.

Observed behaviour:
The for loop doesn't finish, and only gets a few character right at once

Further notes:
Because both are functionally equivalent, I wouldn't expect the for loop to take so much longer (at this stage it's looking like a heat death kind of slow).