google-deepmind / google-deepmind/weathernext

Issues about using ECMWF Open Data for Graphcast/GenCast Operational Input

Open
#170 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
7.7k
Forks
986
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi,

I am looking into use ECMWF Open data [1] as operational Graphcast / GenCast Input instead of ECMWF Operational Archive (HRES-f0). ECMWF confirmed it's feasible [2].

[1] https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/open-data
[2] https://www.ecmwf.int/en/about/media-centre/aifs-blog/2024/run-ai-models-yourself-ecmwf-open-data

However I observed notable discrepancies between the ECMWF Open Data and the ECMWF Operational Archive (HRES-f0). Specifically, differences of up to 8°C in some locations at T0 initial conditions.

I wonder if you have benchmarked Graphcast / GenCast against ECMWF Open data?

Also, Would you recommend using ECMWF Open Data as a substitute for running operational Graphcast / GenCast? Thank you!

Regards,

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.