google-deepmind / google-deepmind/scalable_agent

Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open
#59 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1k
Forks
160
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the [paper](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/1802.01561) and [1 paper-native evaluation](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/1802.01561#results) available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the [Atari Games](https://paperswithcode.co/tasks/atari-games) task page.

The IMPALA (deep, experts) result currently ranks second on [Atari 57](https://paperswithcode.co/benchmark/atari-57-200m-noop?task=atari-games&eval=13479).

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):

[![Papers with Code: #2 on Atari 57](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/1802.01561/leaderboard-badge.svg?eval=13479&live=1)](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/1802.01561/leaderboard-badge-link?eval=13479)

Kind regards,

Niels

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the linked paper and its Papers with Code Atari 57 result, then compare the listed score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the repository and paper. Done means reporting any corrections or confirming that the published evaluation details are accurate; the issue does not name a repository file or test to run.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation, machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.