google-deepmind / google-deepmind/formal-conjectures
Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 1.3k
- Forks
- 485
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 328
Description
### What is the conjecture
The Kazhdan–Lusztig conjecture relates the composition series of Verma modules in Category $\mathcal{O}$ to Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Let $W$ be a Coxeter group (e.g., the Weyl group of a reductive Lie group). For each $w \in W$, let $M_{w \cdot 0}$ denote the Verma module with highest weight $w \cdot 0$ and $L_{w \cdot 0}$ the simple module with highest weight $w \cdot 0$ in the principal block of Category $\mathcal{O}$. The conjecture states that for $w, w' \in W$, the multiplicity of $L_{w \cdot 0}$ in the Jordan-Hölder composition series of $M_{w' \cdot 0}$ is given by evaluating the Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomial $P_{w',w}(q)$ at $q = 1$:
$$[M_{w' \cdot 0} : L_{w \cdot 0}] = P_{w',w}(1)$$
where the Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials are defined recursively in terms of the Hecke algebra associated to $W$.
(This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.)
**Sources:**
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazhdan%E2%80%93Lusztig_polynomial; https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Kazhdan-Lusztig+theory; https://yisun.io/notes/klconj.pdf; https://windshower.github.io/linchen/teaching/s2024/lecture8.pdf; https://www.numdam.org/article/ASENS_1981_4_14_3_261_0.pdf
### Prerequisites needed
**Formalizability Rating:** 5/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-03-14)
Building blocks (1-3; from search results):
- Coxeter groups and Weyl groups (partial support in Mathlib for basic group operations, but not Coxeter-specific theory)
- Modules and composition series (basic infrastructure exists in Mathlib)
- Polynomial rings (polynomial.lean in Mathlib)
Missing pieces (exactly 2; unclear/absent from search results):
- Hecke algebras and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials (not in Mathlib; would require defining the recursive formula and establishing key properties)
- Category $\mathcal{O}$, Verma modules, and the representation theory framework (not in Mathlib; requires development of BGG theory and highest weight representations)
Rating justification (1-2 sentences): The statement requires formalizing Hecke algebras and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials as a new theory, along with the specialized representation-theoretic category $\mathcal{O}$ and Verma modules. While basic building blocks (groups, modules, polynomials) exist in Mathlib, the specific infrastructure needed (Hecke algebras, KL polynomials, BGG theory) requires significant new development.
### [AMS categories](https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/labels?q=ams-)
* ams-20
* ams-17
* ams-05
### Choose either option
- [ ] I plan on adding this conjecture to the repository
- [x] This issue is up for grabs: I would like to see this conjecture added by somebody else
---
This issue was generated by an AI agent and reviewed by me.
If you have feedback on mistakes / hallucinations, feel free to just write it in the issue. See more information here: [link](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/524981-Formal-conjectures/topic/Custom.20Agent.20for.20Issue.20Generation/with/569221879)
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.