How do we avoid falling into line by line translation from GDScript to C#?

Hey 🙂

I was reading through the recent updates in the documentation and stumbled on a C# example that IMHO warrants a bit of discussion. I noticed it due to the recent PR on the CharacterBody2D page (#6614), but the part that bugs me was already there in the 3.x documentation.

So, on this page, we find the following snippet of code.

```cs
public override void _PhysicsProcess(double delta)
{
var collision = MoveAndCollide(Velocity * (float)delta);
if (collision != null)
{
Velocity = Velocity.Bounce(collision.GetNormal());
if (collision.GetCollider().HasMethod("Hit"))
{
collision.GetCollider().Call("Hit");
}
}
}
```

It is (as almost always) a direct translation of the GDScript example. More often than not, converting examples this way is fine. However, here, we are taking a very "duck typing-y" approach of what was returned by `collision.GetCollider()`... And I'd argue presenting this as a good approach in C# could be harmful (I lack a better word here) to the reader. In this particular instance, I guess most people would write this using an interface. But we don't really elaborate on what the object containing that `Hit()` method would be on this page, so I don't know if there's a point.

Anyway, I'm of course not saying we need to tailor every single C# code block completely differently than their GDScript counterpart. But I was curious of other people's opinion about this, if we should try to "correct" this kind of thing when we see them or if I'm just entirely delusional.

Edit: this was tagged automatically by GH, but it should probably be "discussion" instead of "enhancement"?