I have a question about equation (5) of the paper
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 76
- Forks
- 10
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Equation (5) looked at the Chamfer distance equation, but why did it use the max value? Isn't the original equation the min value? It seems that the min value is also used in the chamfer-distance submodule of the published code.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare equation (5) in the paper with the Chamfer-distance submodule in the published code, focusing on the use of max versus min. Determine whether the discrepancy is intentional or an error, then clarify the equation or its documentation so the paper and code agree.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100