glowkeeper / glowkeeper/feedbacker

Define moderation, calibration, and consistency workflows

Open
#5 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
CSS
Stars
1
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Design cohort-level tools that help assessment teams compare interpretations and improve consistency without automating academic judgement.

### Deliverables
- Marker calibration workflow
- Moderation and sampling workflow
- Consistency signals and appropriate escalation paths

### Done when
The workflow supports accountable review across markers, submissions, and cohorts.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named in the issue. Start by mapping the three listed deliverables—calibration, moderation and sampling, and consistency signals—to the existing assessment-team workflows, then define accountable review boundaries and escalation paths. Done means the workflow supports review across markers, submissions, and cohorts without automating academic judgement.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.