Session recall in a fresh session returns another project's history (ordered by recency)
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Avg merge
- 14h 16m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
## Describe the bug
A brand-new CLI session, asked to recall recent work (e.g. "what did we work on?"), can return session history from a *different project* on the same machine. All local sessions share one store (`~/.copilot/session-state.json`), and recall is ordered by global recency rather than the current project, so the most-recent session from an unrelated project is surfaced. When it happens, that content enters the current session's context and can influence the response.
## Affected version
1.0.68
## Steps to reproduce the behavior
1. In a terminal in Project A, run the CLI and have a short session.
2. In a separate terminal in Project B, run a separate session and make it the most recently active one.
3. Open a fresh terminal/session in Project A and ask: "what did we last work on?"
4. It can answer with Project B's work.
Reproduced in a plain terminal with no editor involved (i.e. not specific to any particular editor integration).
## Expected behavior
A fresh session's recall should be scoped to the current project (cwd/repo), or at minimum clearly indicate when it is surfacing another project's session.
## Additional context
**Actual behavior:** Recall resolves across all projects by recency and returns another project's content, with no indication that it crossed a project boundary.
**Notes / observations:**
- Retrieval is agent-mediated and therefore INTERMITTENT: with an identical setup, one fresh session self-scoped to the current project while another surfaced the globally-most-recent (cross-project) session.
- Recency appears to be driven by the latest turn timestamp, not by a session-level `updated_at` field (which can be stale).
- Project attribution can be unreliable: the stored repository value for a session does not always match the session's actual working directory.
**Impact:** Unrelated project context can enter the current session and steer subsequent responses. Because it is intermittent, a single "it stayed in-project" attempt does not prove the session is safe.
**Environment:**
- Operating system: Windows
- Copilot CLI version: 1.0.68
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by inspecting ~/.copilot/session-state.json and the CLI entry point that handles recall in a fresh session. Reproduce the two-project scenario, then trace how sessions are selected and attributed; done means recall stays scoped to the current project or clearly identifies cross-project history.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- shell
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100