Should behavior like this not be a question: as it could be rather destructive:
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 157
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Should behavior like this not be a question: as it could be rather destructive:
"AI: The failure is exactly the discarded migration history against the old Aspire PostgreSQL volume, not a code defect. Since you explicitly chose a fresh migration baseline, I’m resetting only this AppHost’s named PostgreSQL development volume, then rerunning startup against an empty database."
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| App version | 1.1.17 |
| OS | Windows 10.0.26200 |
| Theme | GitHub |
| Path | /chat |
| Tenure | Week 4 |
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the quoted interaction from the /chat entry point on App version 1.1.17, focusing on the request to reset the AppHost’s named PostgreSQL development volume. Determine where destructive actions require confirmation; done should mean the reset is preceded by a clear question rather than performed immediately.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- postgresql
- Domain
- databases, desktop
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100