txn2/kubefwd: cmd/kubefwd/services/services.go; 15 LoC

Found a possible issue in [txn2/kubefwd](https://www.github.com/txn2/kubefwd) at [cmd/kubefwd/services/services.go](https://github.com/txn2/kubefwd/blob/3826043b007191468744542b7def2dd0f3fd3995/cmd/kubefwd/services/services.go#L102-L116)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first
issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

> reference to perm was used in a composite literal at line 106

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/txn2/kubefwd/blob/3826043b007191468744542b7def2dd0f3fd3995/cmd/kubefwd/services/services.go#L102-L116)

Click here to show the 15 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for _, perm := range requiredPermissions {
perm.Namespace = namespace
var accessReview = &authorizationv1.SelfSubjectAccessReview{
Spec: authorizationv1.SelfSubjectAccessReviewSpec{
ResourceAttributes: &perm,
},
}
accessReview, err = clientSet.AuthorizationV1().SelfSubjectAccessReviews().Create(accessReview)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !accessReview.Status.Allowed {
return fmt.Errorf("missing RBAC permission: %v", perm)
}
}

```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: 3826043b007191468744542b7def2dd0f3fd3995