optim-kazuhiro-seida/go-advance-type: collection/collection_bool.go; 4 LoC

Found a possible issue in [optim-kazuhiro-seida/go-advance-type](https://www.github.com/optim-kazuhiro-seida/go-advance-type) at [collection/collection_bool.go](https://github.com/optim-kazuhiro-seida/go-advance-type/blob/da2dcb2969728d918d7a368ac4d8e36b7f4e849c/collection/collection_bool.go#L348-L351)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

>

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/optim-kazuhiro-seida/go-advance-type/blob/da2dcb2969728d918d7a368ac4d8e36b7f4e849c/collection/collection_bool.go#L348-L351)

Click here to show the 4 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for i, v := range *self {
fn(&v, i)
self.Set(i, v)
}

```

Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.

```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.

No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.

root signature {fn 2} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: da2dcb2969728d918d7a368ac4d8e36b7f4e849c

Read collection/collection_bool.go around lines 348-351 and the linked analyzer guidance. Determine whether passing &v to fn and then calling self.Set reflects intended behavior or a range-variable pointer bug. Mark the issue with the appropriate reaction: Bug, Mitigated, or Desirable Behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.