github-vet / github-vet/rangeloop-pointer-findings

lunaisnotaboy/Niiverse-1: handlers.go; 9 LoC

Open
#16,821 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
fresh tiny
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
0
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Found a possible issue in [lunaisnotaboy/Niiverse-1](https://www.github.com/lunaisnotaboy/Niiverse-1) at [handlers.go](https://github.com/lunaisnotaboy/Niiverse-1/blob/af5539d4b2ed05e95bc14aff293a18ee91a2c0fc/handlers.go#L717-L725)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

>

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/lunaisnotaboy/Niiverse-1/blob/af5539d4b2ed05e95bc14aff293a18ee91a2c0fc/handlers.go#L717-L725)

Click here to show the 9 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for _, user := range users {
stmt, err = db.Prepare("INSERT INTO group_members (user, conversation) VALUES (?, ?)")
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
stmt.Exec(&user, &conversationID)
stmt.Close()
}

```

Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.

```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.

No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.

root signature {Exec 2} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: af5539d4b2ed05e95bc14aff293a18ee91a2c0fc

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by reading handlers.go at lines 717-725 and inspect how the range-loop user value is passed to stmt.Exec. Compare the analyzer's finding with the linked project context, then classify the report as Bug, Mitigated, or Desirable Behavior using the project's stated classification guidance.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, sql
Domain
backend, databases
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.