github-vet / github-vet/rangeloop-pointer-findings
amourha/CF-bypass: main.go; 17 LoC
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Found a possible issue in [amourha/CF-bypass](https://www.github.com/amourha/CF-bypass) at [main.go](https://github.com/amourha/CF-bypass/blob/7d0df7e4188aaa464c3ffbda01a4eb41c9d48577/main.go#L48-L64)
Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.
> range-loop variable domain used in defer or goroutine at line 56
[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/amourha/CF-bypass/blob/7d0df7e4188aaa464c3ffbda01a4eb41c9d48577/main.go#L48-L64)
Click here to show the 17 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.
```go
for _, domain := range domains {
// Run all providers in parallel
wg := &sync.WaitGroup{}
wg.Add(len(allProviders))
for _, provider := range allProviders {
go func(p providers.Provider) {
defer wg.Done()
err := p.BypassCF(domain, resultsChannel)
if nil != err && config.Verbose {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, err)
}
}(provider)
}
// Wait for providers to finish
wg.Wait()
}
```
Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.
commit ID: 7d0df7e4188aaa464c3ffbda01a4eb41c9d48577
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.