beekhof/fencing-operator: pkg/stub/fencing.go; 3 LoC

Found a possible issue in [beekhof/fencing-operator](https://www.github.com/beekhof/fencing-operator) at [pkg/stub/fencing.go](https://github.com/beekhof/fencing-operator/blob/ee17c2df84da7d1592c5a75cd1b7c71e1f3b9dcb/pkg/stub/fencing.go#L69-L71)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

>

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/beekhof/fencing-operator/blob/ee17c2df84da7d1592c5a75cd1b7c71e1f3b9dcb/pkg/stub/fencing.go#L69-L71)

Click here to show the 3 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for _, request := range requests {
return h.HandleFencingJob(ctx, &request, job, deleted)
}

```

Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.

```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.

No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.

root signature {HandleFencingJob 4} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: ee17c2df84da7d1592c5a75cd1b7c71e1f3b9dcb

Review pkg/stub/fencing.go at lines 69-71 and read the analyzer details first. Determine whether the reported range-loop reference is a real defect and record the bug classification or resolution; the issue provides no tests or acceptance criteria.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.