943885179/go_wfw: srv/basic/server/api.go; 6 LoC

Found a possible issue in [943885179/go_wfw](https://www.github.com/943885179/go_wfw) at [srv/basic/server/api.go](https://github.com/943885179/go_wfw/blob/29aa7849e5a6932bf93e09c5354cea04ef7f6ded/srv/basic/server/api.go#L72-L77)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

>

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/943885179/go_wfw/blob/29aa7849e5a6932bf93e09c5354cea04ef7f6ded/srv/basic/server/api.go#L72-L77)

Click here to show the 6 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for _, a := range t {
var r dbmodel.SysApi
mzjstruct.CopyStruct(&a, &r)
any, _ := ptypes.MarshalAny(&r)
resp.Data = append(resp.Data, any)
}

```

Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.

```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.

No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.

root signature {CopyStruct 2} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: 29aa7849e5a6932bf93e09c5354cea04ef7f6ded

Review srv/basic/server/api.go at lines 72-77, then inspect the range-loop variable usage and the behavior of CopyStruct and MarshalAny. Determine whether the referenced loop value can escape or be observed incorrectly, and use the issue's requested reaction to classify it as Bug, Mitigated, or Desirable Behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.