kubesphere/notification-manager: pkg/notify/config/types.go; 11 LoC

Found a possible issue in [kubesphere/notification-manager](https://www.github.com/kubesphere/notification-manager) at [pkg/notify/config/types.go](https://github.com/kubesphere/notification-manager/blob/1f653636d4dc48bbc98a618a5b1e6579bba69188/pkg/notify/config/types.go#L376-L386)

Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.

>

[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/kubesphere/notification-manager/blob/1f653636d4dc48bbc98a618a5b1e6579bba69188/pkg/notify/config/types.go#L376-L386)

Click here to show the 11 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.

```go
for _, sc := range scList.Items {
if len(c.nmNamespaces) > 0 && !sliceIn(c.nmNamespaces, sc.Namespace) {
_ = level.Warn(c.logger).Log("msg", "don't need to be watched", "name", sc.Name, "namespace", sc.Namespace)
continue
}

s.GenerateConfig(c, &sc)
if s.SlackConfig != nil {
break
}
}

```

Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.

```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.

No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.

root signature {GenerateConfig 2} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```

Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.

commit ID: 1f653636d4dc48bbc98a618a5b1e6579bba69188

Read pkg/notify/config/types.go around lines 376-386 and trace GenerateConfig, starting with how the range variable sc is passed. Determine whether that pointer can be retained or passed onward, then inspect any related tests. Done means the reported range-loop pointer risk is either reproduced and addressed or shown not to affect behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.