github-vet / github-vet/rangeloop-pointer-findings
gardener/external-dns-management: pkg/controller/provider/infoblox/handler.go; 3 LoC
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Found a possible issue in [gardener/external-dns-management](https://www.github.com/gardener/external-dns-management) at [pkg/controller/provider/infoblox/handler.go](https://github.com/gardener/external-dns-management/blob/563e00b51f77983b373cbff8fc5cad9e290b9943/pkg/controller/provider/infoblox/handler.go#L256-L258)
Below is the message reported by the analyzer for this snippet of code. Beware that the analyzer only reports the first issue it finds, so please do not limit your consideration to the contents of the below message.
>
[Click here to see the code in its original context.](https://github.com/gardener/external-dns-management/blob/563e00b51f77983b373cbff8fc5cad9e290b9943/pkg/controller/provider/infoblox/handler.go#L256-L258)
Click here to show the 3 line(s) of Go which triggered the analyzer.
```go
for _, res := range resT {
state.AddRecord((*RecordTXT)(&res).Copy())
}
```
Click here to show extra information the analyzer produced.
```
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which writes a pointer argument.
No path was found through the callgraph that could lead to a function which passes a pointer to third-party code.
root signature { 1} was not found in the callgraph; reference was passed directly to third-party code
```
Leave a reaction on this issue to contribute to the project by classifying this instance as a **Bug** :-1:, **Mitigated** :+1:, or **Desirable Behavior** :rocket:
See the descriptions of the classifications [here](https://github.com/github-vet/rangeclosure-findings#how-can-i-help) for more information.
commit ID: 563e00b51f77983b373cbff8fc5cad9e290b9943
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with pkg/controller/provider/infoblox/handler.go at lines 256-258 and read the linked code context alongside the analyzer output. Determine whether the range-loop pointer use is a bug, mitigated, or desirable behavior, then classify the finding with evidence from the surrounding code and its call paths.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100