Fil RetroPGF Feedback

([tweet](https://x.com/carl_cervone/status/1788214444171911239))

Just cast my ballot for 47/106 projects participating in Fil RetroPGF!

Some thoughts:
- Loved seeing the Lotus Dependencies as well as other ecosystem projects building on Filecoin in the round!
- The voting portal worked well. It was easy to populate my ballot, browse projects, etc. Allocating voting points rather than tokens was nice too.
- My biggest challenge was reconciling overlapping impact claims: it's hard to attribute the impact of specific PRs or contributions within a repo to separate teams.
- There's also the challenge of evaluating software contributions alongside other forms of contribution (education, ops, etc), but that's nothing new.
- Ops were very smooth (IMHO), esp given that this was a new concept for many badgeholders. h/t to @tomhihihihihi and team for all their behind the scenes work.
- Badgeholder chat was very civil, with good debate and tradeoff discussions. From a governance perspective, this is where much of the value lies.

The issue is a retrospective feedback post and does not name a source file, test, or entry point. Read the linked tweet and surrounding issue context first, then clarify which voting-portal or attribution problem should become an actionable change; completion criteria are not defined.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.