getsolus / getsolus/packages

Investigate whether it is worth it to enable XXH3_128bit build ids in LLVM, Mold and Binutils.

Open
#4,603 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Performance Topic: Plumbing
Dominant language
Python
Stars
141
Forks
146
Avg merge
11h 7m
Merged PRs (30d)
407

Description

Since getsolus/packages#4570 and getsolus/packages#4575 BLAKE3 hashes (truncated to 160 bits / 20 bytes) is now supported and is already a fair bit faster than SHA-1.

This issue is for documenting the speedup of XXH3_128bit vs. SHA-1 and BLAKE3 and then making a decision of whether this speedup is sufficient to make it worth pursuing.

See getsolus/packages#1346 for context.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Read getsolus/packages#1346 first, along with the changes referenced in getsolus/packages#4570 and #4575. Benchmark XXH3_128bit against SHA-1 and truncated BLAKE3 for build IDs in LLVM, Mold, and Binutils, then document the results and make the go/no-go decision.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
build-system, compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.