[Onboarding and Invitation Flow] Onboarding Flow Is Too Brittle
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 44.8k
- Forks
- 4.9k
- Avg merge
- 22h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 586
Description
### Environment
SaaS ([https://sentry.io/]())
### Steps to Reproduce
When you receive an invitation to join a Sentry organization the invitation contains two calls-to-action:

1. Join Your Team
2. Check out the [Sentry website]()
### Expected Result
If you select to check out the Sentry website - the context of visiting this page from an invitation should be maintained. That way you can click the getting started button and be taken to the Invitation Flow.
### Actual Result
Once you opt to check out Sentry first, your only option from this view is to create a new organization. Which creates a poor user experience on first join.
### Brainstorming
Consider adding some query params to the second call to action that will redirect the user to the invitation when clicking Getting Started instead of [https://sentry.io/signup/]()
### Product Area
Sign In
### Link
*No response*
### DSN
*No response*
### Version
*No response*
We want to define a set of [lightweight metrics]() that SDKs can automatically collect for e.g. framework, language or platform, focusing only on signals that **do NOT overlap with Tracing**. Ideally these metrics should give a quick sense of app or runtime health, … while deeper investigation will still rely on traces or profiles.
Examples**:**
* Node.js runtime metrics (e.g., event loop delay, heap usage)
* Prisma-related metrics in Next.js
* Mobile CPU / memory usage to help surface potential ANRs or app hangs
---
**Candidate Metrics (add more below)**
* …
*(please also add ideas, questions or examples in comments)*
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.