getsentry / getsentry/sentry

Support flexible email and webhook alert destinations

Open
#124,431 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Feature
Dominant language
Python
Stars
44.8k
Forks
4.9k
Avg merge
21h 23m
Merged PRs (30d)
607

Description

Organizations using custom ticketing or paging systems need a way to route Sentry alerts without relying on a supported third-party integration. Slack may be available but is not always treated as a paging endpoint, while creating a dedicated Sentry user for an email alias may be incompatible with SAML-enforced provisioning.

The requested capability is a flexible email or webhook-style alert destination that can target an external operational system. Without one, organizations must build and maintain a custom Sentry integration before adopting alerts broadly.

Related requests:

  • #1617 covers arbitrary email recipients and mailing lists; it was closed due to staleness.
  • #9206 covers customizable webhook payloads and was closed with an internal integration as the recommended path.
  • #32313 is an open, destination-specific webhook request for Mattermost.

via anthony.yiannakou.

--

View Junior Session [Sentry]

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No implementation files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by comparing the requirements and outcomes in related issues #1617, #9206, and #32313, then establish the scope for flexible email or webhook destinations and their payload behavior. Done means an external operational system can receive Sentry alerts without a dedicated custom integration.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
api, backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.