getsentry / getsentry/self-hosted
SeaweedFS doesn't seem production ready
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 9.6k
- Forks
- 2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Description
### Self-Hosted Version
25.10
### CPU Architecture
x86_64
### Docker Version
not relevant
### Docker Compose Version
not relevant
### Machine Specification
- [x] My system meets the minimum system requirements of Sentry
### Steps to Reproduce
The seaweedfs docs do not include a full backup/restore strategy: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Data-Backup
The existing solution requires downtime
> This example requires your entire cluster to pause(stop receiving writes) while the volumes are being backed up/transferred
### Expected Result
Stable local S3 provider
### Actual Result
Unstable local S3 provider
### Event ID
_No response_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the SeaweedFS Data-Backup wiki page linked in the report and compare its stated downtime requirement with the self-hosted deployment. Done would require a documented backup/restore strategy that avoids downtime and establishes a stable local S3 provider; the issue does not name repository files or tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100