getsentry / getsentry/self-hosted

SeaweedFS doesn't seem production ready

Open
#4,071 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Category: Docs
Dominant language
Shell
Stars
9.6k
Forks
2k
Avg merge
1d 3h
Merged PRs (30d)
12

Description

### Self-Hosted Version

25.10

### CPU Architecture

x86_64

### Docker Version

not relevant

### Docker Compose Version

not relevant

### Machine Specification

- [x] My system meets the minimum system requirements of Sentry

### Steps to Reproduce

The seaweedfs docs do not include a full backup/restore strategy: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Data-Backup

The existing solution requires downtime

> This example requires your entire cluster to pause(stop receiving writes) while the volumes are being backed up/transferred

### Expected Result

Stable local S3 provider

### Actual Result

Unstable local S3 provider

### Event ID

_No response_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the SeaweedFS Data-Backup wiki page linked in the report and compare its stated downtime requirement with the self-hosted deployment. Done would require a documented backup/restore strategy that avoids downtime and establishes a stable local S3 provider; the issue does not name repository files or tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation, infrastructure
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.