inconsistent RFC links
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 34
- Forks
- 28
- Avg merge
- 27m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
There are 3 different styles of links to RFCs in this repo:
* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4122
* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4180.html
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4122 (which 301s to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4122)
It might be helpful to pick one and stick with it, unless there is a specific reason to prefer different links in different situations.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Search the repository for RFC links and group the occurrences by URL style. Choose and apply one consistent style, checking that the RFC references remain valid and that no documented reason requires different links.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100