getodk / getodk/xforms-spec

current() specification is too narrow

Open
#276 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
CSS
Stars
34
Forks
28
Avg merge
27m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

See this brilliant example by @lognaturel for a case where current() is used without any `instance()` involvement https://github.com/XLSForm/pyxform/pull/472#discussion_r494667102

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Read the current() specification and the linked pyxform discussion, especially the example showing use without instance(). Determine which parts of the specification are too narrow and agree on the intended scope with maintainers. Done means the specification clearly covers the accepted use case and any related examples or tests are updated.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.