current() specification is too narrow
Open
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 34
- Forks
- 28
- Avg merge
- 27m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
See this brilliant example by @lognaturel for a case where current() is used without any `instance()` involvement https://github.com/XLSForm/pyxform/pull/472#discussion_r494667102
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read the current() specification and the linked pyxform discussion, especially the example showing use without instance(). Determine which parts of the specification are too narrow and agree on the intended scope with maintainers. Done means the specification clearly covers the accepted use case and any related examples or tests are updated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100