gemini-cli-extensions / gemini-cli-extensions/conductor
Conductor setup incorrectly assumes a sibling directory is a brownfield project
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.7k
- Forks
- 295
- Avg merge
- 9m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
n my home directory I have src/birdsync, an established project, and src/phorg, a new, empty project. I ran /conductor:setup in src/phorg, and Conductor asked to examine the sibling birdsync directory. I approved this, and Conductor then assumed that I was working on the birdsync project. That's incorrect; I'm working on a new project (phorg). Was I supposed to decline permission to Conductor to examine the birdsync directory? I mean to start a greenfield project in phorg.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the /conductor:setup entry point and trace how it handles an empty project after examining a sibling directory. Reproduce the src/phorg and src/birdsync scenario, then confirm that setup keeps phorg as the project while still allowing the sibling to be inspected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100