geekan / geekan/HowToLiveLonger
单一论文引用并不能形成有力的饮食推荐依据,推荐《中国居民膳食指南》
Open
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 35.1k
- Forks
- 2.4k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
饮食角度的论文常常有互相矛盾的结论,对于学术来讲这是很正常的
##但如果依据这些论文直接形成饮食建议是不合理的,例如 https://github.com/geekan/HowToLiveLonger/issues/106
实际上,中国营养学会刚刚发布了 [2022-05-06][中国居民膳食指南2022](http://dg.cnsoc.org/newslist_0402_1.htm)
在膳食建议上,专家共识比单一论文更可靠。
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #106 and the repository’s current dietary recommendations, then read the linked 2022 Chinese Dietary Guidelines. Done means the relevant dietary guidance reflects expert consensus rather than relying on a single paper, with the guideline cited appropriately.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100