[Bug] bootstrap and fontawesome CDN vs. packages

I originally started this project by adding the Bootstrap 5.3.3 and FontAwesome CDN links to the projects main html page.

Well somewhere along the line, someone installed Bootstrap 5.3.3 and FontAwesome packages to package.json

This makes duplicated and possibly caused problems.

This probably happened once the new html pages were added.

The issue here is which to keep vs which to remove. Do we use CDNs or do we use installed packages?

Either way this duplication needs fixed.

Start by comparing the Bootstrap and FontAwesome references in the project's main HTML page and the dependencies in package.json, then check the newer HTML pages for the same duplication. Decide which source is used consistently and verify that the pages still load their styles and icons. Done means the duplicate dependency path is removed without breaking the frontend.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.