galaxyproject / galaxyproject/training-material

Scope check: synthetic peptide reconstitution tutorial using ToolShed wrapper

Open
#7,031 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
HTML
Stars
367
Forks
1.1k
Avg merge
16h 27m
Merged PRs (30d)
49

Description

# Scope check: synthetic peptide reconstitution tutorial using a ToolShed wrapper

Hello Galaxy Training Network maintainers,

We prepared a small, learner-facing tutorial candidate that demonstrates a reproducible synthetic peptide reconstitution calculation in Galaxy. Before opening a pull request, we would appreciate guidance on whether the scope and placement are appropriate for the training-material repository.

The candidate is intentionally narrow:

- it uses synthetic, non-clinical example values;
- it runs a public ToolShed wrapper for a unit-safe reconstitution calculation;
- it shows the inputs, JSON output, and a short interpretation boundary;
- it links to the source implementation, documentation, and benchmark provenance;
- it does not use customer, patient, clinical, or experimental data.

Candidate files in the canonical public repository:

- [Tutorial](https://github.com/PeptidoMexico/peptidomexico-open-science/blob/main/packaging/galaxy-training/tutorial.md)
- [Metadata](https://github.com/PeptidoMexico/peptidomexico-open-science/blob/main/packaging/galaxy-training/metadata.yaml)
- [Submission notes](https://github.com/PeptidoMexico/peptidomexico-open-science/blob/main/packaging/galaxy-training/README.md)

Related public resources:

- [ToolShed wrapper](https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peptidomexico/peptide_reconstitution_calculator)
- [Read the Docs documentation](https://peptidomexico-open-science.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
- [Synthetic benchmark record](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21896173)

Could you please advise:

1. whether this belongs in the proteomics or another existing GTN subtopic;
2. whether the tutorial should be tested against a specific Galaxy deployment or profile before a pull request;
3. whether any metadata, licensing, or review changes are required; and
4. whether a maintainer would be willing to review a PR once those requirements are met.

The materials are maintained by Péptido México Open Science. Péptido México is a commercial research-materials business; the tool and tutorial are for research-use-only education and reproducibility, with no clinical or therapeutic instructions. We are not requesting a link, stars, or promotional treatment—only feedback on whether the material is useful and compatible with GTN standards.

Thank you,

Péptido México Open Science
hola@peptidomexico.com.mx

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reviewing the linked tutorial.md, metadata.yaml, and README.md in the candidate repository, then compare them with the training-material repository's expectations. Done means receiving maintainer guidance on the appropriate subtopic, Galaxy deployment or profile, metadata and licensing requirements, and whether a pull request is welcome.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
markdown, yaml
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.