interview-to-freeform-summary is reviewed + pipelined but declares zero references

_Filed by Claude (AI assistant) on behalf of @jmchilton._

## The inconsistency

`content/molds/interview-to-freeform-summary/index.md` is `status: reviewed` and a live phase in the `interview-to-galaxy` pipeline, yet it declares **no `references:` manifest at all**. It's the one outlier in the reviewed cohort — a promoted, actively-pipelined Mold with zero runtime references.

For contrast:
- Its downstream `freeform-summary` consumers (`freeform-summary-to-galaxy-interface`, `-data-flow`, `-template`, `-test-plan`) all carry references.
- The other producer of the shared `freeform-summary` shape, `summarize-paper`, also has no references — but it's still `draft` (undeveloped paper corner), so its emptiness is honest. `interview-to-freeform-summary` is the only *reviewed* producer with none.

## Why it matters

`references:` is what casting packages into the SKILL.md as runtime grounding (pattern pages, CLI manuals, research notes). A reviewed, shipped skill with an empty manifest runs with only its procedural body — no packaged guidance on the `freeform-summary` shape, interview normalization, or the uncertainty-preservation discipline the body itself stresses ("Don't over-specify").

Not a validation error — `references` is schema-optional — so this is a health/consistency gap, not a blocker.

## Scope

Figure out what the Mold *actually* leans on and add a real manifest (not a mirror of a sibling). Candidates to investigate:
- A pattern/research note on the shared `freeform-summary` handoff shape (paired with `summarize-paper`), if one exists or should.
- Any interview-conduct / requirements-elicitation guidance worth packaging.
- The uncertainty-vs-invention discipline the body describes — is there a note that codifies it?

If the honest answer is "it genuinely relies on nothing packaged," that's worth recording explicitly rather than leaving an implicit gap.

Read content/molds/interview-to-freeform-summary/index.md first, then inspect the sibling freeform-summary molds and available pattern or research notes for relevant grounding. Done means adding a genuine references manifest to that file, or explicitly recording why no packaged references are appropriate.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.