gajus / gajus/isomorphic-webpack
Comparison Table
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 289
- Forks
- 16
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
> I apologise in advance if I have misrepresented either of the frameworks.
Contact me to correct an error in the above comparison table, if you'd like to add another comparison criteria, or to add another framework.
So I was googling myself this Saturday evening and found your library along with the comparison table.
I can assist in clarifying the details in the comparison table.
* `Only one running node process.` Correct
* `Does not require a separate webpack configuration.` Correct
* `Enables use of all webpack loaders.` Incorrect for `universal-webpack`: it supports all loaders
* `Supports stack trace.` Do you have any proof that the two projects don't support stack traces, or what you're talking about
* `Prevents serving stale data.` Same ^
* `Does not override Node.js require().` Correct
* `Uses webpack target: "node".` Correct
* `Provides low-level API.` Correct
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.