gajus / gajus/isomorphic-webpack

Comparison Table

Open
#17 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
289
Forks
16
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

> I apologise in advance if I have misrepresented either of the frameworks.
Contact me to correct an error in the above comparison table, if you'd like to add another comparison criteria, or to add another framework.

So I was googling myself this Saturday evening and found your library along with the comparison table.

I can assist in clarifying the details in the comparison table.

* `Only one running node process.` Correct
* `Does not require a separate webpack configuration.` Correct
* `Enables use of all webpack loaders.` Incorrect for `universal-webpack`: it supports all loaders
* `Supports stack trace.` Do you have any proof that the two projects don't support stack traces, or what you're talking about
* `Prevents serving stale data.` Same ^
* `Does not override Node.js require().` Correct
* `Uses webpack target: "node".` Correct
* `Provides low-level API.` Correct

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.