fsspec / fsspec/filesystem_spec

[bug?] onerror vs on_error

Open
#1,675 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.4k
Forks
490
Avg merge
2d 3h
Merged PRs (30d)
38

Description

Question: should this call be on_error="raise"? copy is defined with on_error kwarg.

https://github.com/fsspec/filesystem_spec/blob/76ca4a68885d572880ac6800f079738df562f02c/fsspec/spec.py#L1186-L1188

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start in fsspec/spec.py at lines 1186-1188 and compare the call with the copy method's on_error keyword. Confirm which keyword is intended and verify the resulting error-handling behavior before marking the issue complete.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.