[MetaROR] Points for discussion (reviewer-conflict decisions)

Items where reviewer opinions conflict or where the right approach needs authorial judgement. Decide the direction here first; the concrete edit then moves to the relevant chapter / structural issue.

- [ ] #54
- [x] **Depth vs breadth trade-off.** R3 wants more hands-on guidance and practical detail; R1 wants the MRI section pared back. How deep should the handbook go on any single topic? *(links the MRI item in Content gaps)*
- [ ] #51
- [ ] **Preregistration section in Chapter 5.** R1 says remove the confused paragraph about fraudulent preregistration; R2 appreciates the mention of preregistration as open science "in action". Decide how much space preregistration deserves and what angle to take. (R1, R2) <- already partly done, will be clearer when merged with replications
- [ ] #55
- [ ] **Multiverse analysis.** Only mentioned in Table 4.1 but not discussed in the text. Decide whether to add a substantive discussion or remove it from the table. (R3) (#56)
- [ ] #58

**Related existing issues:**
- #4 Extend discussion on disagreement about replication success