Compatibility proposal for payload-plugins: Payload Components example?

Hi — I’m Chai, the maintainer of [Payload Components](https://github.com/Ducksss/payload-components).

I reviewed `focusreactive/payload-plugins` and found an active Payload v3 + Next.js 15/16 setup with an existing block/page-builder structure, a starter/template use case. That looks close to the projects the registry is built for.

Payload Components is MIT source tooling: it installs a block and wires the Pages collection, renderer mapping, generated Payload types, and admin import map rather than leaving those integration steps manual.

Would a small, repository-specific contribution be useful here? I can test a compatibility example against the current default branch and contribute only the smallest documentation or integration diff that is useful to this project.

If this is in scope, which page surface or component family would be most useful? I’ll wait for alignment before opening a larger PR.

Review the current default branch and the existing block/page-builder structure, then compare it with the Payload Components compatibility proposal. First identify which page surface or component family the repository wants to support. Done is a repository-specific compatibility example or the smallest documentation or integration diff agreed with maintainers.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.