flosse / flosse/rust-web-framework-comparison
Understanding of the criteria "outdated"?
Open
help wanted
question
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 5.8k
- Forks
- 224
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I'd like to understand by which criteria a framework is judged as "outdated"? It's a loaded classification so I think it is fair to be transparent about the criteria by which the frameworks are evaluated.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing framework classifications and the 11-comment discussion to identify how “outdated” is currently being applied. The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Done means documenting transparent, agreed criteria for the classification and applying or explaining them consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100