flathub / flathub/com.spotify.Client

Maybe contact upstream?

Open
#241 1 comment 3 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
113
Forks
41
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi!
Someone made an idea submission over here: [Spotify should take official ownership of the Linux Flatpak package](https://community.spotify.com/t5/Closed-Ideas/Spotify-should-take-official-ownership-of-the-Linux-Flatpak/idi-p/5578184)
It's got enough votes to been brought forward, answered with 3rd party partnership rejection policy.
However, they mention "**This doesn't mean that such a partnership is not possible in the future, so if we do have any new information to share, rest assured we'll check back in here with a new status.**"
and linked [the FAQ](https://community.spotify.com/t5/FAQs/Idea-Exchange-Guidelines-Why-was-my-idea-closed/ta-p/5171164)
which states:

> We just want to be as transparent as possible and give timely updates, so don’t despair if your idea is set to Case Closed - with time and new votes, we’ll be reviewing our existing suggestion and revising conversations with the right teams.

> It should also be noted that we cannot comment on third-party integrations, _**before they come out**_. For this reason we will generally set those ideas to Case Closed at some point. Also, in some cases we can’t update the idea until it’s actually been implemented for a variety of reasons.

I wonder if they'll consider it if you can get in touch (maybe [email](mailto:support@spotify.com), or tag on tw? [@SpotifyCares](https://twitter.com/SpotifyCares))

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.