firecrawl / firecrawl/anydoc

JVM Bindings

Open
#74 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement P3
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
21.5k
Forks
1.3k
Avg merge
42m
Merged PRs (30d)
17

Description

This is a fantastic tool, and I'd like to embed it's use in some of my harnesses.

My harness runs in JVM, and while I realize there are plenty of protocols I could use to connect (MCP, etc...), there are specific reasons I'd like to avoid this sort of I/O in some workflows where possible.

Any plans to add Java/JVM bindings?

I'd be open to help, if there is desire to support the feature as well as design guidance.

Thank you for building cool things!

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by reviewing the repository's existing Node.js and Python bindings and the main Rust entry points to understand their supported interfaces. Determine the intended Java/JVM binding scope and design guidance before implementation; done means a reviewed, usable JVM integration that fits the project's existing binding approach.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java, rust
Domain
api, developer-experience
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.