firecracker-microvm / firecracker-microvm/firecracker-containerd

volume: Can't we have a uniform interface for normal containers and in-VM containers?

Open
#634 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Go
Stars
2.9k
Forks
247
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker-containerd/pull/631#pullrequestreview-979369783

> I think this is fine for now, but I'd like to see a follow up (maybe just an issue for now) with a deeper dive on if we could make this more transparent. Could we do it with the abstractions we have today? Is there a way to extend the containerd abstractions to allow this?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the linked pull request review and trace the current volume handling for normal containers and in-VM containers. Read the containerd abstractions referenced there, then determine whether they can expose a uniform interface; done means a concrete design or implementation path is agreed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.