firecracker-microvm / firecracker-microvm/firecracker-containerd
volume: Can't we have a uniform interface for normal containers and in-VM containers?
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 247
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker-containerd/pull/631#pullrequestreview-979369783
> I think this is fine for now, but I'd like to see a follow up (maybe just an issue for now) with a deeper dive on if we could make this more transparent. Could we do it with the abstractions we have today? Is there a way to extend the containerd abstractions to allow this?
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the linked pull request review and trace the current volume handling for normal containers and in-VM containers. Read the containerd abstractions referenced there, then determine whether they can expose a uniform interface; done means a concrete design or implementation path is agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100