The update record syntax doesn't generate the right fully-qualified name in Scala when it refers to another function

**Describe the bug**
The update record syntax doesn't generate the right fully-qualified name in Scala when it refers to another function

**To Reproduce**
```elm
bar =
{ foo | field = 1 }
```

Where foo is a reference to another function

**Expected behavior**
It should generate valid Scala with a copy constructor.

Start by locating the Scala code-generation path for Elm update-record expressions and reproduce the provided example where foo refers to another function. Compare the generated fully qualified name with the expected valid Scala copy-constructor form; done means the example generates valid Scala.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.