festim-dev / festim-dev/V-V-report
Better W retention validation case
Open
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.04.003
Having discussions with @ehodille @gabriele-ferrero and @rekomodo we think that this validation case would be better than #21
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read the paper at the DOI and compare its proposed tungsten retention validation case with issue #21. Inspect the repository structure to find where the existing case is documented, then determine whether the intended outcome is to replace or add the case and update the report accordingly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100