feat: Add dedicated MCP server container in the Feast operator Deployment
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7.3k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Avg merge
- 3d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 15
Description
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
The MCP server runs inside the same container as the online feature server, sharing the same port, process, and resources. No way to isolate MCP traffic or allocate dedicated resources.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Add a dedicated MCP container in the existing Feast pod with its own port, resource limits, and Kubernetes Service. Same sidecar pattern as the registry, offline, and UI containers.
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
**Additional context**
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Inspect the Feast operator Deployment and Kubernetes Service, then compare the existing registry, offline, and UI sidecar patterns. Done means the Feast pod has a dedicated MCP container with its own port and resource limits, plus a Kubernetes Service for MCP traffic.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- kubernetes, python
- Domain
- devops, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100