facebookresearch / facebookresearch/segment-anything
Using box + point gives worse results comparing to only boxes
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 54.9k
- Forks
- 6.4k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I have an object detection model and I want to create masks for those objects using SAM, I have done prompting with the output boxes given by my obj detection model but results given by SAM was not as I wanted (results are good but there are some errors), so I decided to add a point with box (the point is the center of the box which is on the object for almost all images), but results given now are a little worse than the first try (for images in which the point is clearly on the object).
I have an object detection model and I want to create masks for these objects using SAM, I have done prompts with the output boxes given by my obj detection model but the results given by SAM were not as I wanted (the results are good but there are some errors), so I decided to add a point with the box (the point is the box center which is on the object for almost all images), but the results given now are a little worse than the first try (for images for which the point is clearly on the object)..
Any explication for that?
Thanks,
Contributor guide
Research direction
The report describes worse masks when combining object-detection boxes with center-point prompts in SAM, but names no repository file, test, or reproducible example. Start by reproducing the comparison with box-only and box-plus-point prompts, then determine whether the behavior is expected or represents a fixable defect.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100